Mac D For Danger

Posted on
Application-how did this product apply?
glidestugs
Moisturizing-how moisturizing is this product?
hydratingdrying
Long-Wearing-how long-wearing is this product?
stays all daydisappears quickly
Colour-does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?
Pigmentation-how pigmented is this product?
Luster-how lustrous is this product?
Buildable-how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product?
builds easilyhard to build
Feathering-how feathering is this product?
stays putfeathers or bleeds
Texture-how is the texture of this product?
smoothgritty
Value-how would you rate the value of this product overall?
overdeliveredunderdelivered

Mac Lipstick- D FOR DANGER. 4.5 out of 5 stars 10. 50 $19.49 $19.49. Get it as soon as Mon, Aug 26. FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by Amazon. Only 15 left in stock - order soon. More Buying Choices $16.65 (17 new offers) Little MAC Lipstick 0.06 oz/ 1.77 ml D FOR DANGER. D for Danger is a permanent lipstick shade at MAC. I recently found it when I was browsing their Retro Matte collection. Anyways, I paired UD Naked Smoky with this berry lips. I went with a winged liner, and bronze on the lids. Writing pad for mac. 97467 MAC MAC Little MAC Traditional Lipstick - D For Danger MAC Little MAC Traditional Lipstick - D For Danger at ASOS. Shop this season’s must haves with multiple delivery and return options (Ts&Cs apply). Jul 18, 2015  D for Danger is a permanent lipstick shade at MAC. I recently found it when I was browsing their Retro Matte collection. Anyways, I paired UD Naked Smoky with this berry lips. I went with a winged liner, and bronze on the lids.

MAC D for Danger is a neutral-toned, medium berry with a matte finish. It is a permanent lipstick that retails for $19.50 and contains 0.1 oz.

Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Feedback for the application category the current four is a sign that responses to 'how did this product apply?' generally indicate glides. Considering feedback for the colour category the current rating of six indicates considering the question 'does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?' heavily favor true to colour. Considering the pigmentation category the rating of six suggests reviewers in response to the 'how pigmented is this product?' primarily suggest opaque. Reviewing the luster category a rating of one suggests users & critics evaluating 'how lustrous is this product?' generally suggest matte. Looking at review rankings for the texture category an average total of five suggests replies to 'how is the texture of this product?' frequently lean smooth.

at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.

without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.

as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.

an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.

Mac D For Danger Lipstick

we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .